 |
ßäåðíà ô³çèêà òà åíåðãåòèêà
ISSN:
1818-331X (Print), 2074-0565 (Online) |
| Home page | About |
Full text (en) Model-independent results from DAMA/LIBRA-phase2-empowered
R. Bernabei1,2,*, P. Belli1,2, A. Bussolotti1,2, F. Cappella3, V. Caracciolo1,2, R. Cerulli2, C. J. Dai4, A. d’Angelo3,5, A. Incicchitti3,5, A. Leoncini1,2, X. H. Ma4, A. Mattei3,5, V. Merlo1,2, F. Montecchia1,2,6, X. D. Sheng4, Z. P. Ye7
1 Department of Physics, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
2 National Institute for Nuclear Physics, Rome Tor Vergata Section, Rome, Italy
3 National Institute for Nuclear Physics, Rome Section, Rome, Italy
4 State Key Laboratory of Particle Astrophysics, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China
5 Department of Physics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
6 Department of Civil Engineering and Computer Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
7 Jinggangshan University, Ji’an, Jiangxi, P.R. China
*Corresponding author. E-mail address:
rita.bernabei@roma2.infn.it
Abstract: The DAMA/LIBRA-phase2 experiment was upgraded in 2021 to enhance its sensitivity by lowering the software energy threshold while maintaining a large efficiency. The new configuration, referred to as DAMA/LIBRA-phase2-empowered, collected data for three years. This study extends the investigation of the long-standing, model-independent annual modulation effect pointed out by the DAMA highly radiopure NaI(Tl) experimental setups at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory of the National Institute for Nuclear Physics, using different experimental configurations. The software energy threshold of DAMA/LIBRA-phase2-empowered is below 1 keV, and the exposure is 0.541 t⋅yr. Adding these new results to the previously released DAMA/LIBRA-phase2, the exposure is 2.07 t⋅yr over 11 independent annual cycles, yielding evidence for a signal that fulfills all the requirements of the model-independent Dark Matter annual modulation signature at a confidence level of 13.9 σ in the 1–6 keV energy region. In the 2–6 keV interval, where data from DAMA/NaI and DAMA/LIBRA-phase1 are also available, the combined exposure reaches 3.40 t⋅yr, corresponding to a confidence level of 15.3 σ. No systematic effect or side process capable of simultaneously satisfying all the distinctive features of the exploited Dark Matter annual modulation signature and accounting for the observed modulation amplitude is available.
Keywords: Dark Matter, elementary particle processes, scintillation detectors.
References:1. DAMA Collaboration. Publication list. http://dama.web.roma2.infn.it
2. R. Bernabei et al. The DAMA/LIBRA apparatus. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 592 (2008) 297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2008.04.082
3. R. Bernabei et al. First results from DAMA/LIBRA and the combined results with DAMA/NaI. Eur. Phys. J. C 56 (2008) 333. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0662-y
4. R. Bernabei et al. New results from DAMA/LIBRA. Eur. Phys. J. C 67 (2010) 39. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1303-9
5. R. Bernabei et al. Performances of the new high quantum efficiency PMTs in DAMA/LIBRA. JINST 7 (2012) P03009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/7/03/P03009
6. R. Bernabei et al. Final model independent result of DAMA/LIBRA-phase1. Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2648. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2648-7
7. DAMA Collaboration. Special issue dedicated to DAMA Collaboration. Int. J. of Mod. Phys. A 31(31) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X1642001X
8. R. Bernabei et al. First model independent results from DAMA/LIBRA-phase2. Nucl. Phys. At. Energy 19 (2018) 307. https://doi.org/10.15407/jnpae2018.04.307
9. R. Bernabei et al. The DAMA project: Achievements, implications and perspectives. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 114 (2020) 103810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2020.103810
10. R. Bernabei et al. Further results from DAMA/LIBRA-phase2 and perspectives. Nucl. Phys. At. Energy 22 (2021) 329. https://doi.org/10.15407/jnpae2021.04.329
11. R. Bernabei et al. Performances of the ≃ 100 kg NaI(Tl) set-up of the DAMA experiment at Gran Sasso. Il Nuovo Cim. A 112 (1999) 545. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03035868
12. R. Bernabei et al. Dark Matter search. Riv. Nuovo Cim. 26(1) (2003) 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03548916
13. R. Bernabei et al. Dark matter particles in the galactic halo: Results and implications from DAMA/NaI. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 13 (2004) 2127. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271804006619
14. A.K. Drukier, K. Freese, D.N. Spergel. Detecting cold dark-matter candidates. Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 3495. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.33.3495
15. K. Freese, J. Frieman, A. Gould. Signal modulation in cold-dark-matter detection. Phys. Rev. D 37 (1988) 3388. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.37.3388
16. R. Bernabei et al. Status of DAMA/LIBRA-phase2 and its empowered stage. Bled Workshops in Physics 25 (2024) 1. http://bsm.fmf.uni-lj.si/bled2024bsm/talks/proceedII.pdf
17. P. Belli. Annual modulation results from DAMA/LIBRA. Talk at the RICAP-2024 (The 9th edition of the Roma International Conference on AstroParticle Physics), Frascati, Sept 23-27, 2024. EPJ Web of Confer. 319 (2025) 10001. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202531910001
18. R. Bernabei for DAMA activities. The DAMA project legacy. Bled Workshops in Physics 26 (2025) 44. https://ebooks.uni-lj.si/ZalozbaUL/catalog/view/845/1240/12540
19. E. Aprile et al. (The XENON Collaboration). WIMP Dark Matter search using a 3.1 tonne-year exposure of the XENONnT experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 (2025) 221003. https://doi.org/10.1103/msw4-t342
20. M.F. Albakry et al. (The SuperCDMS Collaboration). Search for low-mass electron-recoil dark matter using a single-charge sensitive SuperCDMS-HVeV Detector. Phys. Rev. D 113 (2026) 032001. https://doi.org/10.1103/5lnp-6mng
21. N. Carlin et al. (The COSINE-100 Collaboration, ANAIS-112 Collaboration). Combined annual modulation Dark Matter search with COSINE–100 and ANAIS–112. Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 (2025) 121002. https://doi.org/10.1103/9j7w-qp1c