 |
ßäåðíà ô³çèêà òà åíåðãåòèêà
ISSN:
1818-331X (Print), 2074-0565 (Online) |
| Home page | About |
Full text (ua) Criticality of fuel-containing materials in the “Shelter” object
V. I. Borysenko*, V. V. Goranchuk, D. I. Khvalin
Institute for Safety Problems of Nuclear Power Plants, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
*Corresponding author. E-mail address:
vborysenko@ispnpp.kiev.ua
Abstract: The article presents the results of the analysis of the validity of simplifications and assumptions accepted by researchers in the models of neutron-physical characteristics of fuel-containing materials (FCM) in the "Shelter" object (SO). The analysis and substantiation of the FCM nuclear safety will be one of the important issues during the SO operation for a long time, until the moment of retrieval and disposal of nuclear materials from the ChNPP Unit 4 destroyed in 1986. A significant number of nuclear materials in the SO are uncontrolled, and the geometry of their location is also little known. Therefore, the use of traditional methods of nuclear safety analysis to determine the conditions for reaching criticality in the volume of FCM can lead to significant uncertainties, depending on the assumptions and simplifications made in FCM models. In contrast to traditional nuclear facilities with design characteristics and control systems, there is no possibility to deterministically influence the FCM, and accordingly to determine their dynamic characteristics in the SO. In such conditions, it is necessary to take a responsible approach to obtain and interpret the values of FCM parameters by control systems of the SO. For example, in 1990, one of the neutron flux detectors recorded an abnormal change in the neutron pulse count rate for about 100 hours. This event is often called a “neutron incident”, and it formed the basis of some models, in which the possibility of reaching criticality in one of the FCM clusters is assumed. The article presents the results of the study on the physical possibility of the anomalous event in 1990, as well as the results of the analysis of simplifications and assumptions made in models of FCM criticality. An important result of the conducted research is the justification of the need to include in the FCM criticality model the effects of reactivity on fuel and water temperature, as well as to take into account delayed neutrons.
Keywords: fuel-containing materials, "Shelter" object, effective neutron multiplication factor, reactivity, reactivity effects, neutron incident, delayed neutrons.
References:1. V.A. Babenko, V.N. Pavlovych. Study of ignition possibility, development and properties of self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction in the fuel-containing masses of the object "Ukryttya". Nucl. Phys. At. Energy 18(3) (2017) 254. (Rus) https://doi.org/10.15407/jnpae2017.03.254
2. V.A. Babenko, V.N. Pavlovych. Study of the properties of self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction in the fuel-containing masses of the "Ukryttya" object for the case of varying velocity of water inflow. Nucl. Phys. At. Energy 19(1) (2018) 21. (Rus) https://doi.org/10.15407/jnpae2018.01.021
3. V.M. Pavlovych, V.A. Babenko. On the possibility of the self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction inside the "Shelter" object at the present time. Nucl. Phys. At. Energy 24(3) (2023) 239. (Ukr) https://doi.org/10.15407/jnpae2023.03.239
4. E.D. Vysotsky, R.L. Godun. Neutron activity of lava-like clusters of fuel-containing materials on the fourth Chernobyl unit. Problems of Nuclear Power Plants' Safety and of Chornobyl 25 (2015) 108. (Rus) https://www.ispnpp.kiev.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/2015_25/c108.pdf
5. V.A. Babenko et al. Modelling of mass and geometrical parameters of a aggregation of fuel containing materials in the southeast part of a premise 305/2 destroyed 4th unit Chernobyl NPP. Problems of Nuclear Power Plants' Safety and of Chornobyl 9 (2008) 36. (Rus) https://www.ispnpp.kiev.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/2008_09/c36.pdf
6. Report on the 1st stage of the contract No. 19-ÌÎÑ/95 dated 07.07.95 'The state of nuclear, radiation and environmental safety of the facility "Shelter"' (Moskva: "Kurchatov Institute", 1995) 232 p. (Ukr? Rus?)
7. R.V. Arutyunyan et al. Nuclear Fuel in the "Shelter" Object of the Chernobyl NPP (Moskva: Nauka, 2010) 241 p. (Rus)
8. A.A. Borovoi, E.P. Velikhov. The Experience of Chernobyl (Work at the "Shelter" Object). Part 1 (Moskva: "Kurchatov Institute", 2012) 168 p. (Rus)
9. Analysis of the current safety of the "Shelter" object and predictive assessments of the development of the situation: Report of the ISTC "Shelter". Archival No. 3836 (Chornobyl, 2001) 337 p. (Rus)
10. "Shelter" Object – 10 years. Main Results of Scientific Research (Chornobyl: ISTC "Shelter", 1996) 188 p. (Rus)
11. A.A. Klyuchnikov et al. "Shelter" Object: 1986 - 2011. On the Way to Transformation (Chornobyl: Institute for Safety Problems of Nuclear Power Plants, 2011) 288 p. (Rus) https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/42/109/42109580.pdf
12. A.A. Klyuchnikov et al. "Shelter" Object: 1986 - 2006 (Chornobyl: Institute for Safety Problems of Nuclear Power Plants, 2006) 168 p. (Rus) https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/37/075/37075404.pdf
13. A.M. Berezovets et al. Neutron space distribution in VVER ionization chamber channels. Problems of Atomic Science and Technology. Series "Physics and Technology of Nuclear Reactors" 8 (1987) 74. (Rus)
14. E.D. Vysotsky et al. Neutron-physical characteristics of nuclear dangerous accumulations of fuel contained materials. Problems of Nuclear Power Plants' Safety and of Chornobyl 12 (2009) 93. (Rus) https://www.ispnpp.kiev.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/2009_12/c93.pdf
15. O.V. Mykhailov et al. Features of neutron flux density and gamma-radiation exposure dose rate dynamics in ChNPP Shelter object after the new safe confinement commissioning. Nuclear Power and the Environment 2(27) 2023 44. http://doi.org/10.31717/2311-8253.23.2.5
16. V.I. Borysenko. Comment on the article: V. I. Skalozubov, I. L. Kozlov, Yu. A. Komarov, O. A. Chulkin, O. I. Piontkovskyi. Analysis of nuclear safety in diversification of Westinghouse fuel assemblies at WWER-1000. Nucl. Phys. At. Energy 21(2) (2020) 210. (Ukr) https://doi.org/10.15407/jnpae2020.02.210
17. V.I. Borysenko. That is it necessary: to determine period or reactivity of reactor? Problems of Nuclear Power Plants' Safety and of Chornobyl 13 (2010) 8. (Rus) https://www.ispnpp.kiev.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/2010_13/c8.pdf
18. V.I. Borysenko, V.V. Goranchuk. Determination of conservative parameters of model of reactor for research of transient of VVER-1000. Problems of Nuclear Power Plants' Safety and of Chornobyl 20 (2013) 28. (Rus) https://www.ispnpp.kiev.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/2013_20/c28.pdf