![]() |
ßäåðíà ô³çèêà òà åíåðãåòèêà
ISSN:
1818-331X (Print), 2074-0565 (Online) |
Home page | About |
Possibilities of synthesis of superheavy nuclei in hot fusion reactions
G. G. Adamian1,2, N. V. Antonenko1, A. S. Zubov1
1Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia
2Institute of Nuclear Physics, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Abstract: The actinide-based hot fusion reactions with stable projectiles heavier than 48Ca are analyzed within the dinuclear system model for compound nucleus formation. Predictions for several reactions with radioactive beams for the synthesis of heaviest elements are also presented for the future interest. Possibilities of production of new isotopes of superheavy nuclei with charge numbers 104-108 in incomplete fusion reactions are studied.
References:1. Oganessian Yu. Ts. et al. Physical Review C 62 (2000) 041604(R); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.62.041604
Physical Review C 69 (2004) 021601(R); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.69.021601
Physical Review C 69 (2004) 054607. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.69.054607
2. Sobiczewski A., Gareev F. A., Kalinkin B. N. Physics Letters 22 (1966) 500; https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9163(66)91243-1
Möller P., Nix J. R. Journal Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 20 (1994) 1681. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/20/11/003
3. Hofmann S., Mönzenberg G. Review of Modern Physics 72 (2000) 733. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.72.733
4. Brack M., Damgaard J., Jensen A. S. et al. Review of Modern Physics 44 (1972) 320. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.44.320
5. Volkov V. V. Izv. AN SSSR. Ser. Fiz. 50 (1986) 1879;
Antonenko N. V. et al. Physics Letters B 319 (1993) 425; https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(93)91746-A
Physical Review C 51 (1995) 2635. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.51.2635
6. Adamian G. G., Antonenko N. V., Scheid W. Nuclear Physics A 618 (1997) 176; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(97)88172-9
Adamian G. G., Antonenko N. V., Scheid W., Volkov V. V. Nuclear Physics A 627 (1997) 361; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(97)00605-2
Nuclear Physics A 633 (1998) 409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00124-9
7. Adamian G. G., Antonenko N. V., Scheid W. Nuclear Physics A 678 (2000) 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00317-1
8. Adamian G. G., Antonenko N. V., Scheid W. Physical Review C 69 (2004) 011601(R); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.69.011601
Physical Review C 69 (2004) 014607; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.69.014607
Physical Review C 69 (2004) 044601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.69.044601
9. Fröbrich P., Lipperheide R. Theory of Nuclear Reactions (Clarendon, Oxford, 1996). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198537830.001.0001
10. Audi G., Wapstra A. H. Nuclear Physics A 565 (1993) 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(93)90024-R
11. Möller P., Nix J. R. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 39 (1988) 213; https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-640X(88)90022-8
LANL Preprint LA-UR-86-3983 (1986).
12. Möller P., Nix J. R., Myers W. D., Swiatecki W. J. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 59 (1995) 185. https://doi.org/10.1006/adnd.1995.1002
13. Myers W. D., Swiatecki W. J. Nuclear Physics A 601 (1996) 141; https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(95)00509-9
14. Raman S., Nestor C. W., Tikkanen P. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 78 (2001) 1. https://doi.org/10.1006/adnd.2001.0858
15. Adamian G. G., Antonenko N. V., Ivanova S. P., Scheid W. Physical Review C 62 (2000) 064303; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.62.064303
Zubov A. S. et al. Physical Review C 65 (2002) 024308. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.65.024308
16. Cherepanov E. A., Iljinov A. S. Nucleonika 25 (1980) 611.
17. Adamian G. G., Antonenko N. V., Scheid W. Physical Review C 68 (2003) 034601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.68.034601
18. Gäggeler H. et al. Physical Review C 33 (1986) 1983. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.33.1983
19. Hoffman D. C. et al. Physical Review C 31 (1985) 1763. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.31.1763
20. Türler A. et al. Physical Review C 46 (1992) 1364. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.46.1364