Nuclear Physics and Atomic Energy

ßäåðíà ô³çèêà òà åíåðãåòèêà
Nuclear Physics and Atomic Energy

  ISSN: 1818-331X (Print), 2074-0565 (Online)
  Publisher: Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
  Languages: Ukrainian, English
  Periodicity: 4 times per year

  Open access peer reviewed journal


 Home page   About 
Nucl. Phys. At. Energy 2000, volume 1, issue 2, pages 51-54.
Section: Nuclear Physics.
Published online: 30.12.2000.
PDF Full text (en)
https://doi.org/10.15407/jnpae2000.02.054

8Be-decay of the 24Mg 46.4 MeV resonance

A. Tumino1,2, O.Yu. Goryunov3, M. Lattuada1,2, V.V. Ostashko3, S. Romano2, C. Spitaleri2,4, D. Vinciguerra1,2

1Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy
2Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Catania, Italy
3Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
4DMFCI, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy

Abstract: 8Begs coincidences with 12C, 8Begs and α-particles produced in the 12C + 12C interaction at 65 MeV have been measured in a wide in-plane angular range. The 3-8Begs final state is found to be produced, even if poor statistics prevent any identification of the 16O states involved in the first stage of the process. The 8Begs - α and 8Begs - 12C coincidence yields are found to be to 12C and 16O excited states, decaying into the 8Begs + α and 12C + α system, respectively.

References:

1. Wuosmaa A. H., Betts R. R., Back B. B. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 1295. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1295

2. Wuosmaa A. H., Freer M., Back B. B. et al. Phys. Rev. C 50 (1994) 2909. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.50.2909

3. Wuosmaa A. H. Z. Phys. A 349 (1994) 249. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01288969

4. Chappell S. P. G., Watson D. L., Fox S. P. et al. Phys. Rev. C 51 (1995) 695. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.51.695

5. Aliotta M., Cherubini S., Costanzo E. et al. Z. Phys. A 353 (1995) 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01297726

6. Aliotta M., Cherubini S., Costanzo E. et al. Nucl. Phys. A 583 (1995) 281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(94)00673-B

7. Freeman R. M., Haas F., Elanique A. et al. Phys. Rev. C 51 (1995) 3504. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.51.3504

8. Aliotta M., Cherubini S., Costanzo E. et al. Z. Phys. A 354 (1996) 119. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769501

9. Le Marechal R. A., Clarke N. M., Freer M. et al. Phys. Rev. C 55 (1997) 1881. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.55.1881

10. Szilner S., Basrak Z., Freeman R. M. et al. Phys. Rev. C 55 (1997) 1312. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.55.1312

11. Eswaran M. A. Proceed. of Intern. Nucl. Phys. Symposium (December 18 - 22, 1995, Bombay, India).

12. Costanzo E., Lattuada M., Romano S. et al. Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 295 (1990) 373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(90)90715-I

13. Freer M., Clarke N. M., Curtis N. et al. Phys. Rev. C 51 (1995) 1682. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.51.1682